Research at Burgas Free University >
2. Издания на БСУ от международни конференции / Collection of Papers of BFU from International Conferences >
2013 >
Том II >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://research.bfu.bg:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/455
|
Title: | За правото на висше образование и пределите на ограничаването му от страна на държавата в светлината на решението на Европейския съд по правата на човека по делото Tarantino and Others v. Italy |
Other Titles: | The right to higher education and the limits of its restriction by the state in the light of the decision of the European Court of human rights in the case of Tarantino and Others v. Italy |
Authors: | Margaritova-Vuchkova, Svetla |
Keywords: | right to education art. 2 of Protocol 1 of the European Convention on human rights |
Issue Date: | 2013 |
Publisher: | Burgas Free University, 62, San Stefano Str., 8001 Burgas, Bulgaria |
Citation: | International Research Conference “Knowledge - traditions, innovations, perspectives”, Burgas 14-15 June 2013 |
Series/Report no.: | BFU_MK_2013_TOM_II;str-47 |
Abstract: | University education as a human right is proclaimed in a number of international
treaties – the UN Convention on the rights of the child (art. 28), the Universal Declaration of
human rights (art. 26), the International Covenant on economic, social and cultural rights
(art. 13), the European Convention on human rights and fundamental freedoms. Art. 2 of the
first additional protocol of the Convention reads: „No one may be deprived of the right to
education (...)”
It is obvious that that right has a non-absolute character. At the same time the states have
the obligation not only to provide and promote the access to the different levels of schooling,
but also to set the criteria for this access, provided they do not impose unjustified restrictions
or proscriptions.
In the case of Tarantino and Others v. Italy the European Court was seized for the first time
to rule on the issue of compatibility of the Italian law with art. 2 of Protocol 1 of the
Convention regarding the act of restriction imposed by the state on the student admission
process for several majors at all the Italian universities - both state and private universities.
On the 2nd of April 2013, the court ruled that the state did not misuse their prudence with the
act of regulating the access to University education and by setting a certain quota for
admission. The opinion of the majority of the judges is not shared by Judge Pinto de
Albuquerque, who argues that the restrictions are not only in conflict with numerous
international acts of the United Nations and the EU, but also that they aim to decrease the
rate of competition among health care professionals.
The Tarantino and Others v. Italy case set on the agenda the question about the autonomy of
the universities, particularly that of private universities and whether the state has legal basis
and the authority to limit their sovereignty. |
Description: | International research conference 2013 |
URI: | http://research.bfu.bg:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/455 |
ISBN: | 978-954-9370-96-6 |
Appears in Collections: | Том II
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|